You might be tempted to respond to a negative review on the platform on which it appears, but the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and state patient privacy laws may prevent that, says Connie Galietti, JD, director of legal and professional affairs at APA. Just because a patient has publicly divulged that they have seen you doesn’t give you permission to acknowledge this fact.
APA Ethics Code Standards on confidentiality, testimonials, and avoidance of patient harm likewise pose limitations on your ability to respond to these reviews, says Lindsay Childress-Beatty, JD, PhD, interim director of APA’s Ethics Office. For example, Standard 4.07 says that psychologists can’t disclose information in public material in ways that could identify the client to others without permission from the client. Standard 5.05 says you can’t solicit testimonials from current clients or from past clients who are vulnerable to your influence. Other ethical no-nos include offering free sessions or other concessions, tracking down complainers on social media and asking them to retract their statements, and requiring clients to sign nondisparagement agreements, all of which potentially place clients in a vulnerable position.
If a review is so egregious that you believe you should respond, see APA’s article on dealing with bad reviews for helpful guidance.
In general, you can’t ask a site to remove a review—for better or worse, these sites can legally post any material in the public domain and have strict policies about review removal. There are exceptions, however. One is when a review contains inflammatory, racist, sexist, or prejudicial content. Another is when the review is factually inaccurate and does not reflect your mode of practice, in which case you can petition the site with a letter or other relevant information. The site’s terms of service will detail what you can and can’t do and the steps you can take to remove reviews that violate the terms.