by Legal and Regulatory Affairs Staff
July 31, 2009 Update: The Red Flag Rules is now scheduled to take effect on November 1, 2009.
March 26, 2009 — The "Red Flag Rules" (Rule) from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) takes effect on May 1, 2009. Some psychologists may need to comply with the rule, which is intended to reduce identity theft. This article and appendices offer guidance for practitioners.
"Red flags" is a term the FTC uses to refer to "potential patterns, practices or specific activities indicating the possibility of identity theft." Although the agency has stated that the Rule was designed primarily for financial institutions and other traditional creditors, the FTC announced last fall that that it would also apply the Rule to health care practitioners who are considered "creditors."
Health care practitioners are considered "creditors" if they:
Provide services and then bill patients later; or
Regularly allow their patients to defer payment for services — including by setting up payment plans — on a "regular" basis.
If you meet either of these criteria, the Rule will apply to you.
We contacted the FTC to determine how often a psychologist would have to permit delayed payment for that practice to be considered "regular" under the second situation noted above. Based on informal guidance from the agency, we recommend that you should expect that second situation applies to you unless you only let patients defer payment on a rare or sporadic occurrence, and when your normal payment policies do not provide for patients to defer payments. When these circumstances exist, the practice of extending credit probably would not be considered "regular." By contrast, if you allow your clients to delay payment more often than on a rare or sporadic basis, you should plan to comply with the Rule.
The FTC believes that the Rule is important in the health care industry because of the rising incidence of identity theft related to medical information. Medical identity theft involves using someone else's personally identifiable information — such as name, date of birth, social security number or insurance policy number — to bill for goods and services related to health care. These acts can seriously damage the victim's medical record and credit. They can also lead to inappropriate care if health care providers rely on the inaccurate information in the victim's medical record to make health care decisions.
Egregious examples of medical identity theft include a man receiving $350,000 in cardiac surgery services using a neighbor's identity. Another victim, whose identity was stolen by a person seeking to obtain surgery, discovered that the identity thief's medical information was commingled with her own when she found an incorrect notation of diabetes in her record.

