skip to main content
Education

Opposing proposed changes to Department of Education grant regulations

APA Services urged the Department of Education (ED) to withdraw proposed changes to its grant administration regulations, citing concerns about research funding, grant stability, transparency, and the future of education and workforce development programs

APA Style leaf logo Cite This Article in APA Style
American Psychological Association. (2026, October 14). Opposing proposed changes to Department of Education grant regulations. https://www.apaservices.org/advocacy/news/opposing-changes-education-grant-regulations

Sign outside the U.S. Department of Education headquarters building in Washington, D.C.

APA Services recently submitted comments to the U.S. ED opposing proposed changes to the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) (PDF, 263KB)opens in new window. The proposal mirrors several provisions included in a separate Office of Management and Budget (OMB) proposal on federal financial assistanceopens in new window that Congress recently blocked from implementation through December 11, 2026, in its fiscal year 2027 continuing resolution. APA previously raised concerns that the OMB proposal could undermine transparency, research funding, and merit-based grantmaking.

In its comments on the ED proposed rule, APA Services warned that the edgar proposal could create uncertainty for schools, institutions of higher education, researchers, workforce development programs, and community partners that rely on federal education grants. The letter highlighted concerns about expanded authority to terminate grants, reduced protections for continuation funding, limits on appeal processes, preferences for lower indirect cost rates, and changes that could undermine educational research and workforce development efforts. APA Services emphasized the importance of stable and predictable federal investments in education, behavioral health workforce development, school-based mental health services, and education research.

APA Services also argued that the proposal should be considered alongside recent actions that have disrupted the department’s ability to administer and oversee federal education programs, including reductions in force, organizational restructuring, delayed release of congressionally appropriated funds, and grant terminations. Advocates cautioned that the proposed rule could further reduce predictability, transparency, and accountability in federal grant administration, creating additional challenges for students, educators, researchers, trainees, and communities that rely on federal investments.

Election 2026 APA Services Voter Guide

Many issues affecting psychologists and their communities are on the ballot this November, and your engagement in the upcoming election can impact the future of your work and the well-being of society. Use the 2026 APA Services Voter Guide to learn how you can engage in the upcoming election and educate candidates and communities about the importance of psychology and the issues that matter to you.

APA Services also joined comments with the higher education community and Friends of the Institute of Education Sciences (PDF, 194KB)opens in new window expressing similar concerns with the proposed rule. Collectively, the letters urged the department to withdraw the proposed rule and preserve transparent, predictable, and evidence-based grantmaking processes that support education, research, and workforce development nationwide.

For more information, email Raegina Likewise.

You may also like